public class FieldsType
extends java.lang.Object
Java class for anonymous complex type.
The following schema fragment specifies the expected content contained within this class.
<complexType>
<complexContent>
<restriction base="{http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}anyType">
<sequence>
<element ref="{http://www.arekusu.com}FieldType" maxOccurs="unbounded" minOccurs="0"/>
</sequence>
<attribute name="schema" type="{http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}string" />
<attribute name="table" type="{http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}string" />
</restriction>
</complexContent>
</complexType>
| Modifier and Type | Field and Description |
|---|---|
protected java.util.List<FieldType> |
fieldType |
protected java.lang.String |
schema |
protected java.lang.String |
table |
| Constructor and Description |
|---|
FieldsType() |
| Modifier and Type | Method and Description |
|---|---|
java.util.List<FieldType> |
getFieldType()
Gets the value of the fieldType property.
|
java.lang.String |
getSchema()
Gets the value of the schema property.
|
java.lang.String |
getTable()
Gets the value of the table property.
|
void |
setSchema(java.lang.String value)
Sets the value of the schema property.
|
void |
setTable(java.lang.String value)
Sets the value of the table property.
|
protected java.util.List<FieldType> fieldType
protected java.lang.String schema
protected java.lang.String table
public java.util.List<FieldType> getFieldType()
This accessor method returns a reference to the live list,
not a snapshot. Therefore any modification you make to the
returned list will be present inside the JAXB object.
This is why there is not a set method for the fieldType property.
For example, to add a new item, do as follows:
getFieldType().add(newItem);
Objects of the following type(s) are allowed in the list
FieldType
public java.lang.String getSchema()
Stringpublic void setSchema(java.lang.String value)
value - allowed object is
Stringpublic java.lang.String getTable()
Stringpublic void setTable(java.lang.String value)
value - allowed object is
String